Menage a journo
It looks as though my comments about the PR big three - embarking on intimate relations with a journalist, a client and a colleague - have taken the PR world by storm (well, two people, at the very least, have mentioned it to me over the last week).
This flurry of activity should, being an on-the-ball industry blogger, inspire me to open a debate into the ethics of these relations. I might ask: is it acceptable to ask a journalist to cover your story having embarked on out of hours activities with him/her? (the story being your client -- not the sex). If so, how soon after the event is it acceptable to pitch the client? (I once came across a PR, who after going home with a journalist, pulled a notebook and pen from her bag with the intention of booking some time for an interview with her client. It worked).
Instead, here are the fruits of my labour and the outcome of the pub-based discussions I've had - PR TOP TRUMPS. For each completed general manoeuvre, you earn yourself 10 points. The rest is scored based on gossip-worthiness.
The first person to reach 100 points wins a new client.
PR TOP TRUMPS
General manoeuvres
1. Relationships with a journalist - 10 points, and 5 points for each piece of coverage achieved thereafter
2. Relationships with an analyst - 10 initial points, and an extra point for each industry report you receive free of charge
3. Relationships with a colleague - 10 initial points, and an extra point earned for the colleague being your boss
4. Relationships with an industry association - impossible to achieve. They're locked away in conference rooms (often in Hannover or Amsterdam) and never come out to play
Specialist manoeuvres - to be attempted only by experts
1. Relations with a competitor - 50 points, and 10 points thereafter for every new business lead stolen
2. Blogger relations - 100 extra points for the blogger being the anonymous kind (TWL, watch out)

6 Comments:
I want to take a moment to share a horror story:
I dated a journalist. He wrote about my client endlessly, and very positively during a long running crisis.
PR Week then chose to write one of those analysis pieces on the coverage of said crisis, using my bloke's headline to illustrate the extent of the positive coverage achieved at such a bad time.
What I thought odd was that PR Week didn't notice or comment that that magazine was hardly target for my client - or generally reporting on these kind of issues.
Ahem....
Another horror story for the record. I also dated a journalist. Rather than giving me positive coverage though, he refused point blank to cover my client's stories.
He felt it would comprimise his lofty and respected position to do so - and told his editorial team the same.
Sadly, it was the key publication for one of the agency's highest paying clients - and they weren't amused when week after week they weren't mentioned.
Journalit integrity. Overrated.
Not wanting to get too deep... I appreciate this isn't that kind of forum... but how is that journalist integrity??
They have misunderstood the point.
They are supposed to write about companies without bias. To not write at all, when their readers would be interested, is as bad (in fact worse) that the other way around.
Hope you dumped him.
I have to agree with anonymous poster number three (as you shall be henceforth known). While I'm not saying it's wrong to engage in a bit of t'other with the press - you'd hope whoever you chose would be big enough (pardon the pun) to either write / or not about your clients based on the newsworthiness of your story.
Anonymous two - you could do better.
I was once asked by a journalist what it was 'worth' to have my story printed in his trade magazine. When I asked him what he meant he replied 'I think you know what I meant'.
I'm quite sure this type of journalist isn't at all common - but an all round unsavoury experience.
Ew.... bet he had a beard. (comment from anonymous 3 to anonymous 4)....
P'raps I should just get a sign-in name that is anonymous...
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home